US Shale Industry Shows Remarkable Resilience

  • Date: 16/03/15
  • Ed Crooks, Financial Times

The industry’s ability to keep growing at lower prices than in recent years will depend on how far it can reduce its costs.

For the US shale industry, competing against Saudi Arabia and the other low-cost oil producers in the Middle East is like stepping into the boxing ring with the heavyweight champion.

At its latest meeting in November, Opec, the oil producers’ cartel, decided against a cut in output to support the crude price, sending it into freefall. Saudi Arabia, the cartel’s most powerful member, has insisted that this was not intended to be a “war on shale”, but Ali al-Naimi, the country’s oil minister, used a speech in Berlin this month to stress that it was not the role of Middle East nations to “subsidise higher-cost producers”.

North American shale companies are among those higher-cost producers, and evidence of the impact on them of the near 60 per cent fall in US crude since last summer is now mounting: in declining profits, cuts in jobs and investment and idled equipment. A handful of shale producers have gone bankrupt, while some others are struggling with large debts.

The number of rigs drilling for oil in the US has dropped 46 per cent from its peak last October, and this is starting to affect output. The US government’s Energy Information Administration said last week that in two of the three principal shale regions — the Bakken of North Dakota and the Eagle Ford of south Texas — oil production was expected to fall marginally next month. Only in the Permian basin of west Texas is it still rising.

But, so far, overall US output seems to be only levelling off, rather than collapsing. If US crude stays at its present level of about $45 per barrel, then it seems likely that production will start falling later this year. But Wood Mackenzie, a consultancy, is forecasting that US oil production will grow this year and next, if there is a rebound in prices to about $60 per barrel.

The industry’s ability to keep growing at lower prices than in recent years will depend on how far it can reduce its costs. Adam Sieminski, head of the EIA, says: “We have seen that shale oil works very well at $100 per barrel. Now we are going to find out if it works at $50 to $75.”

The round of earnings and outlook statements in recent weeks from the US exploration and production companies — the small to midsized independents that led the shale revolution — showed that while they are all cutting activity sharply, none is expecting a corresponding fall in output.

Even more than conventional oilfields, shale puts operators on a treadmill because the flow from each well falls rapidly after it is brought into production. Companies need to keep drilling just to hold output steady. Yet the US independents are telling their investors that they can maintain production roughly level, even while running many fewer rigs.

EOG Resources, for example, plans a 40 per cent capital spending cut this year but expects just a 3 per cent drop in production. Hess is cutting spending by 14 per cent but expects production growth of about 12 per cent.

Achieving the outcomes projected by US shale producers for this year would represent one of the most remarkable productivity performances ever achieved by any industry.

There is a precedent for such a dramatic improvement. After 2008, US natural gas prices collapsed, and some analysts predicted that shale gas producers would be wiped out.

The number of rigs drilling for gas fell from 1,606 in the summer of 2008 to just 268 last week. Yet US gas production has continued to rise.

Full story

Recent Popular Articles


We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. By continuing without changing your cookie settings, we assume you agree to this. Please read our privacy policy to find out more.